Group-Level EEG-Processing Pipeline for Flexible Single Trial-Based Analyses Including Linear Mixed Models

Here we present an application of an EEG processing pipeline customizing EEGLAB and FieldTrip functions, specifically optimized to flexibly analyze EEG data based on single trial information. The key component of our approach is to create a comprehensive 3-D EEG data structure including all trials a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in neuroscience Vol. 12; p. 48
Main Authors Frömer, Romy, Maier, Martin, Abdel Rahman, Rasha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 06.02.2018
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI10.3389/fnins.2018.00048

Cover

More Information
Summary:Here we present an application of an EEG processing pipeline customizing EEGLAB and FieldTrip functions, specifically optimized to flexibly analyze EEG data based on single trial information. The key component of our approach is to create a comprehensive 3-D EEG data structure including all trials and all participants maintaining the original order of recording. This allows straightforward access to subsets of the data based on any information available in a behavioral data structure matched with the EEG data (experimental conditions, but also performance indicators, such accuracy or RTs of single trials). In the present study we exploit this structure to compute linear mixed models (LMMs, using lmer in R) including random intercepts and slopes for items. This information can easily be read out from the matched behavioral data, whereas it might not be accessible in traditional ERP approaches without substantial effort. We further provide easily adaptable scripts for performing cluster-based permutation tests (as implemented in FieldTrip), as a more robust alternative to traditional omnibus ANOVAs. Our approach is particularly advantageous for data with parametric within-subject covariates (e.g., performance) and/or multiple complex stimuli (such as words, faces or objects) that vary in features affecting cognitive processes and ERPs (such as word frequency, salience or familiarity), which are sometimes hard to control experimentally or might themselves constitute variables of interest. The present dataset was recorded from 40 participants who performed a visual search task on previously unfamiliar objects, presented either visually intact or blurred. MATLAB as well as R scripts are provided that can be adapted to different datasets.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Camillo Porcaro, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione (ISTC) - CNR, Italy; Maximilien Chaumon, UMR7225 Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), France
This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Edited by: Alexandre Gramfort, Inria Saclay - Île-de-France Research Centre, France
ISSN:1662-453X
1662-4548
1662-453X
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2018.00048