Mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis
Objective This study investigated the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in patients with active or healed infective endocarditis (IE) with mitral regurgitation and evaluated effects on left ventricular (LV) function and structure. Methods Subjects comprised 19 patients who underwent MV operati...
Saved in:
Published in | General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 277 - 280 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
Springer Japan
01.06.2008
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1863-6705 1863-6713 |
DOI | 10.1007/s11748-007-0209-4 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
This study investigated the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in patients with active or healed infective endocarditis (IE) with mitral regurgitation and evaluated effects on left ventricular (LV) function and structure.
Methods
Subjects comprised 19 patients who underwent MV operations for IE between December 2004 and September 2007. MV repair was performed for acute IE in 10 of 15 patients (67%) and for healed IE in 4 of 4 patients (100%).
Results
No early or late postoperative deaths were encountered. One patient underwent redo MV repair owing to severe mitral regurgitation 1 month postoperatively. Postoperative echocardiography after MV repair demonstrated less than trivial (acute IE in seven, healed IE in three) or mild (acute IE in three, healed IE in one) mitral regurgitation. In patients with MV replacement, the postoperative left atrial dimension (LAD) was decreased (51.5 ± 39.2 vs. 39.2 ± 1.9 mm,
P
= 0.007); however LV end-diastolic dimension (LVDD) and LV end-systolic dimension were unchanged. In patients with MV repair, LVDD (57.5 ± 6.5 vs. 46.0 ± 5.6 mm,
P
< 0.001), LV end-systolic dimension (36.1 ± 5.2 vs. 32.4 ± 6.2 mm,
P
= 0.04), LAD (43.1 ± 8.1 vs. 33.6 ± 7.7 mm,
P
= 0.003) were reduced. Postoperative ejection fraction (55.3 ± 13.5% vs. 41.8% ± 10.0%,
P
= 0.03) and fraction shortening (30.1% ± 9.2% vs. 20.7% ± 5.5%,
P
= 0.03) were better in patients with MV repair than those with MV replacement.
Conclusions
MV repair is feasible in patients with both active and healed IE. MV repair preserves better LV function and structure postoperatively. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1863-6705 1863-6713 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11748-007-0209-4 |