Random sampling, abundance-extinction dynamics and niche-filtering immigration constraints explain the generation of species richness gradients

The paradigm that species' patterns of distribution, abundance and coexistence are the result of adaptations of the species to their niches has recently been challenged by evidence that similar patterns may be generated by simple random processes. We argue here that a better understanding of ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and biogeography Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 352 - 362
Main Authors Carnicer, Jofre, Brotons, Lluís, Sol, Daniel, de Cáceres, Miquel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Publishing
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
DOI10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00380.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:The paradigm that species' patterns of distribution, abundance and coexistence are the result of adaptations of the species to their niches has recently been challenged by evidence that similar patterns may be generated by simple random processes. We argue here that a better understanding of macroecological patterns requires an integration of both ecological and neutral stochastic approaches. We demonstrate the utility of such an integrative approach by testing the sampling hypothesis in a species-energy relationship of forest bird species. A Mediterranean biome in Catalonia, Spain. To test the sampling hypothesis we designed a metacommunity model that reproduces the stochastic sampling from a regional pool to predict local species richness variation. Four conceptually different sampling procedures were evaluated. We showed that stochastic sampling processes predicted a substantial part (over 40%) of the observed variation in species richness, but left considerable variation unexplained. This remaining variation in species richness may be better understood as the result of alternative ecological processes. First, the sampling model explained more variation in species richness when the probability that a species colonises a new locality was assumed to increase with its niche width, suggesting that ecological differences between species matter when it comes to explaining macroecological patterns. Second, extinction risk was significantly lower for species inhabiting high-energy regions, suggesting that abundance-extinction processes play a significant role in shaping species richness patterns. We conclude that species-energy relationships may not simply be understood as a result of either ecological or random sampling processes, but more likely as a combination of both.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00380.x
istex:8D1F22C9D00D566F9D72438F4D759E764D5A81C0
ark:/67375/WNG-643H7K7B-K
ArticleID:GEB380
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
DOI:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00380.x