The efficacy and safety of irsogladine maleate in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis

Irsogladine maleate, an enhancer of gastric mucosal protective factors, has demonstrated its efficacy for various gastric mucosal injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irsogladine for prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin-induced...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Korean journal of internal medicine Vol. 34; no. 5; pp. 1008 - 1021
Main Authors Shim, Ki-Nam, Kim, Jin Il, Kim, Nayoung, Kim, Sang Gyun, Jo, Yun Ju, Hong, Su Jin, Shin, Jeong Eun, Kim, Gwang Ha, Park, Kyung Sik, Choi, Suck Chei, Kwon, Joong Goo, Kim, Jie-Hyun, Kim, Hyun Jin, Kim, Ji Won
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 01.09.2019
대한내과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-3303
2005-6648
2005-6648
DOI10.3904/kjim.2017.370

Cover

More Information
Summary:Irsogladine maleate, an enhancer of gastric mucosal protective factors, has demonstrated its efficacy for various gastric mucosal injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irsogladine for prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, exploratory clinical trial, 100 patients over 50 years of age who needed continuous NSAIDs or aspirin for more than 8 weeks were randomly assigned to either test group (irsogladine maleate 2 mg, twice daily, 39 patients for full analysis) or placebo group (37 patients for full analysis). Primary outcomes were incidence of peptic ulcer and ratio of modified Lanza score (MLS) 2 to 4. Secondary outcome was the number of acute erosions confirmed by endoscopy at 8 weeks. Adverse effects were also compared. There were no significant differences in gastric protective effects between test and placebo groups. However, two cases of peptic ulcer in the placebo group but none in the test group were observed. These two cases of peptic ulcer were Helicobacter pylori-negative. In addition, H. pylori-negative group showed significant changes in MLS score (p = 0.0247) and edema score (p = 0.0154) after the treatment compared to those before treatment in the test group. There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups. The efficacy of irsogladine maleate was found in H. pylori-negative group, suggesting its potential as a protective agent against NSAIDs or aspirin-induced peptic ulcer and gastritis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:1226-3303
2005-6648
2005-6648
DOI:10.3904/kjim.2017.370