Interactions between Polygenic Scores and Environments: Methodological and Conceptual Challenges

Interest in the study of gene-environment interaction has recently grown due to the sudden availability of molecular genetic data-in particular, polygenic scores-in many long-running longitudinal studies. Identifying and estimating statistical interactions comes with several analytic and inferential...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSociological science Vol. 7; no. 19; pp. 365 - 386
Main Authors Domingue, Benjamin, Trejo, Sam, Armstrong-Carter, Emma, Tucker-Drob, Elliot
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Society for Sociological Science 01.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2330-6696
2330-6696
DOI10.15195/v7.a19

Cover

More Information
Summary:Interest in the study of gene-environment interaction has recently grown due to the sudden availability of molecular genetic data-in particular, polygenic scores-in many long-running longitudinal studies. Identifying and estimating statistical interactions comes with several analytic and inferential challenges; these challenges are heightened when used to integrate observational genomic and social science data. We articulate some of these key challenges, provide new perspectives on the study of gene-environment interactions, and end by offering some practical guidance for conducting research in this area. Given the sudden availability of well-powered polygenic scores, we anticipate a substantial increase in research testing for interaction between such scores and environments. The issues we discuss, if not properly addressed, may impact the enduring scientific value of gene-environment interaction studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Elliot M. Tucker-Drob: Department of Psychology and Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.
Emma Armstrong-Carter: Graduate School of Education, Stanford University.
Sam Trejo: La Follette School of Public Affairs & Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
ISSN:2330-6696
2330-6696
DOI:10.15195/v7.a19