Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions

• Published in: Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes Vol. 9; no. 6; pp. 629 - 640
• Main Authors: Mortazavi, Bobak J., Downing, Nicholas S., Bucholz, Emily M., Dharmarajan, Kumar, Manhapra, Ajay, Li, Shu-Xia, Negahban, Sahand N., Krumholz, Harlan M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.11.2016
• Subjects: Aged; Algorithms; Data Mining - methods; Databases, Factual; Female; Heart Failure - diagnosis; Heart Failure - therapy; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Nonlinear Dynamics; Patient Readmission; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Support Vector Machine; Telemedicine; Time Factors; meta-analysis; heart failure; patient readmission; machine learning; computers
• ISSN: 1941-7713; 1941-7705; 1941-7705
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039

The current ability to predict readmissions in patients with heart failure is modest at best. It is unclear whether machine learning techniques that address higher dimensional, nonlinear relationships among variables would enhance prediction. We sought to compare the effectiveness of several machine learning algorithms for predicting readmissions. Using data from the Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes trial, we compared the effectiveness of random forests, boosting, random forests combined hierarchically with support vector machines or logistic regression (LR), and Poisson regression against traditional LR to predict 30- and 180-day all-cause readmissions and readmissions because of heart failure. We randomly selected 50% of patients for a derivation set, and a validation set comprised the remaining patients, validated using 100 bootstrapped iterations. We compared C statistics for discrimination and distributions of observed outcomes in risk deciles for predictive range. In 30-day all-cause readmission prediction, the best performing machine learning model, random forests, provided a 17.8% improvement over LR (mean C statistics, 0.628 and 0.533, respectively). For readmissions because of heart failure, boosting improved the C statistic by 24.9% over LR (mean C statistic 0.678 and 0.543, respectively). For 30-day all-cause readmission, the observed readmission rates in the lowest and highest deciles of predicted risk with random forests (7.8% and 26.2%, respectively) showed a much wider separation than LR (14.2% and 16.4%, respectively). Machine learning methods improved the prediction of readmission after hospitalization for heart failure compared with LR and provided the greatest predictive range in observed readmission rates.