Rainfall disaggregation for hydrological modeling: is there a need for spatial consistence?

• Published in: Hydrology and earth system sciences Vol. 22; no. 10; pp. 5259 - 5280
• Main Authors: Müller-Thomy, Hannes, Wallner, Markus, Förster, Kristian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 15.10.2018; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Bivariate analysis; Case studies; Catchments; Computer simulation; Daily precipitation; Design modifications; Disaggregation; Extreme values; Extreme weather; Hydraulic flow; Hydrologic models; Hydrological research; Hydrology; Identification; Mathematical models; Modelling; Parallel processing; Parameterization; Precipitation variability; Rain; Rain gauges; Rainfall intensity; Rainfall simulators; Rainfall-runoff modeling; Rainfall-runoff relationships; Resampling; Runoff; Runoff models; Spatial distribution; Statistical methods; Statistics; Time series; Watersheds; Germany
• ISSN: 1607-7938; 1027-5606; 1607-7938
• DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-5259-2018

In this study, the influence of disaggregated rainfall products with different degrees of spatial consistence on rainfall–runoff modeling results is analyzed for three mesoscale catchments in Lower Saxony, Germany. For the disaggregation of daily rainfall time series into hourly values, a multiplicative random cascade model is applied. The disaggregation is applied on a station by station basis without consideration of surrounding stations; hence subsequent steps are then required to implement spatial consistence. Spatial consistence is represented here by three bivariate spatial rainfall characteristics that complement each other. A resampling algorithm and a parallelization approach are evaluated against the disaggregated time series without any subsequent steps. With respect to rainfall, clear differences between these three approaches can be identified regarding bivariate spatial rainfall characteristics, areal rainfall intensities and extreme values. The resampled time series lead to the best agreement with the observed ones. Using these different rainfall products as input to hydrological modeling, we hypothesize that derived runoff statistics – with emphasis on seasonal extreme values – are subject to similar differences as well. However, an impact on the extreme values' statistics of the hydrological simulations forced by different rainfall approaches cannot be detected. Several modifications of the study design using rainfall–runoff models with and without parameter calibration or using different rain gauge densities lead to similar results in runoff statistics. Only if the spatially highly resolved rainfall–runoff WaSiM model is applied instead of the semi-distributed HBV-IWW model can slight differences regarding the seasonal peak flows be identified. Hence, the hypothesis formulated before is rejected in this case study. These findings suggest that (i) simple model structures might compensate for deficiencies in spatial representativeness through parameterization and (ii) highly resolved hydrological models benefit from improved spatial modeling of rainfall.