Free associations and social representations: some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods

Free association is a technique frequently used for the collection of social representations, notably in the structural approach. Two methods are commonly used for analysing the associations produced. The rank-frequency method, which cross-tabulates the frequency of an item with its appearance ranki...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inQuality & quantity Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 489 - 507
Main Authors Dany, Lionel, Urdapilleta, Isabel, Lo Monaco, Grégory
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.03.2015
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0033-5177
1573-7845
DOI10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z

Cover

More Information
Summary:Free association is a technique frequently used for the collection of social representations, notably in the structural approach. Two methods are commonly used for analysing the associations produced. The rank-frequency method, which cross-tabulates the frequency of an item with its appearance ranking; the importance-frequency method (or ranked associations), which replaces the appearance ranking criterion with an importance ranking criterion which consists in ranking a posteriori the elements named. We carried out a comparative analysis of these two methods based on a collection of free association corpora concerning the representations of cancer ( N = 55 ), palliative care ( N = 259 ) and academic success ( N = 138 ). The results indicate that many subjects (82.96 %) make changes to the spontaneously produced representation during the ranking of elements. These modifications directly affect the representational fields and the organisation of the representation. The a posteriori ranking of the representational elements allows the available knowledge on the object of representation to be re-contextualised and the accent to be placed on the functional aspect of the social element which is specific to social representations and not to prototypes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-5177
1573-7845
DOI:10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z