Children’s beliefs in reciprocation of biases and flexibility

Children display positive and negative biases based on peers’ attractiveness, gender, and race, but it is unclear whether children who associate positive attributes with certain peers also believe those peers think positively of them. In each domain (attractiveness, gender, and race), we measured 3-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of experimental child psychology Vol. 137; pp. 39 - 56
Main Authors Rennels, Jennifer L., Langlois, Judith H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2015
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-0965
1096-0457
DOI10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.007

Cover

More Information
Summary:Children display positive and negative biases based on peers’ attractiveness, gender, and race, but it is unclear whether children who associate positive attributes with certain peers also believe those peers think positively of them. In each domain (attractiveness, gender, and race), we measured 3- to 11-year-olds’ (N=102) biases and flexibility and their beliefs in reciprocity of bias and flexibility by asking who would think positively of them. Children could choose one of two unfamiliar peers (forced choice assessment) or had the additional options of choosing both peers or neither peer (non-forced choice assessment). We found that children often displayed beliefs in reciprocation, with beliefs in positive bias reciprocation from attractive girls showing the largest effect sizes. These beliefs were significantly correlated with and were predictive of children’s positive and negative biases and flexibility. The duality of children’s beliefs may contribute to strengthening their biases and segregating social groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Jennifer L. Rennels, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Judith H. Langlois, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
ISSN:0022-0965
1096-0457
DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.007