Efficacy of combined treatment with S-carboxymethylcysteine (carbocisteine) and clarithromycin in chronic rhinosinusitis patients without nasal polyp or with small nasal polyp

In Japan, fourteen-membered ring macrolides, antibacterial agents, and S-carboxymethylcysteine (SCMC; carbocisteine), a mucolytic, are commonly used to treat chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and they are also used in combination. However, no large-scale randomized study has examined the effects of thes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAuris, nasus, larynx Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 38 - 47
Main Authors Majima, Yuichi, Kurono, Yuichi, Hirakawa, Katsuhiro, Ichimura, Keiichi, Haruna, Shinichi, Suzaki, Harumi, Kawauchi, Hideyuki, Takeuchi, Kazuhiko, Naito, Kensei, Kase, Yasuhiro, Harada, Tamotsu, Moriyama, Hiroshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.02.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0385-8146
1879-1476
1879-1476
DOI10.1016/j.anl.2011.04.015

Cover

More Information
Summary:In Japan, fourteen-membered ring macrolides, antibacterial agents, and S-carboxymethylcysteine (SCMC; carbocisteine), a mucolytic, are commonly used to treat chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and they are also used in combination. However, no large-scale randomized study has examined the effects of these pharmacotherapies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of combined administration of clarithromycin (CAM), a fourteen-membered ring macrolide, and SCMC, compared with CAM single therapy. Patients with CRS were centrally registered and randomly assigned to treatment with CAM (200 mg/day) alone (monotherapy group) or CAM (200 mg/day) in combination with SCMC (1500 mg/day; combination group) for 12 weeks. We assessed the clinical efficacy of the treatments using measures of subjective symptoms and objective findings, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) determined by the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) score and computed tomography (CT) score. Four hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled (combination group, 213; monotherapy group, 212). At week 12 of treatment, the rate of effectiveness was significantly higher in the combination group (64.2%) compared with the monotherapy group (45.6%; P = 0.001). In addition, objective findings, including characteristics of nasal discharge ( P = 0.008) and post-nasal discharge ( P = 0.002) were significantly improved in the combination group. In both groups, SNOT-20 and CT scores were significantly improved from week 0 ( P < 0.001), and were not significantly different between groups. The results indicated that long-term combination therapy with SCMC at a dose of 1500 mg/day and CAM at a dose of 200 mg/day is effective for improving subjective symptoms and objective findings in adult patients with CRS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0385-8146
1879-1476
1879-1476
DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2011.04.015