Feasibility of a Non-Anticipatory, Random-Action Target System to Improve Shooting Performance: A Brief Field Trial

• Published in: Sports (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 11; p. 305
• Main Authors: Smith, Matthew Lee, Boolani, Ali
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 11.11.2024; MDPI
• Subjects: Accuracy; Analysis; Decision making; Feasibility; Firearm accidents & safety; firearm training; Law enforcement; Methods; Military personnel; Police; random-action target system; Shooting; shooting accuracy; shooting performance; Training; United States; firearm training; random-action target system; shooting accuracy; shooting performance
• ISSN: 2075-4663; 2075-4663
• DOI: 10.3390/sports12110305

Firearm shooting performance training rightfully focuses on shooting accuracy; however, additional foci should include decision processing speed and reaction time associated with decision making to avoid reaction-only based shooting responses. While advancements in realistic training environments attempt to mimic “real-world” situations, many remain largely anticipatory or subject to a speed–accuracy trade-off (SAT). The purpose of this brief field trial was to demonstrate the feasibility of a random-action target system (RATS) on participants’ shooting performance (i.e., accuracy, omission, and commission rates) among a convenience sample of six retired police officers and competitive shooters (age range: 45–58 years, mean age = 52.5 ± 5.89). Observational data were gathered from a single-day, three-round trial to test shooting accuracy and shooting errors when shooters were unable to anticipate target appearance location and target exposure speed. In Trial 1, the target exposure time was 0.5 s, which increased to 0.7 s in Trial 2, and decreased back to 0.5 s in Trial 3. Shooting accuracy generally increased, while omission and commission generally decreased, when shooters were presented with targets exposed for longer durations. From Trial 1 to Trial 3 (both trials with 0.5 s target exposures), shooters showed higher median accuracy rates, lower median omission rates, and lower median commission rates. Findings suggest that a non-anticipatory, RATS holds promise for improving shooting performance and offset SAT among shooters with firearm experience. However, additional trials are needed with the RATS to replicate these findings among a larger and more diverse set of participants, who train with the RATS consistently, over longer durations.