Assessment of the potential allergenicity of genetically-engineered food crops

An extensive safety assessment process exists for genetically-engineered (GE) crops. The assessment includes an evaluation of the introduced protein as well as the crop containing the protein with the goal of demonstrating the GE crop is "as-safe-as" non-GE crops in the food supply. One of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of immunotoxicology Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 43 - 53
Main Author Ladics, Gregory S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.01.2019
Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1547-691X
1547-6901
1547-6901
DOI10.1080/1547691X.2018.1533904

Cover

More Information
Summary:An extensive safety assessment process exists for genetically-engineered (GE) crops. The assessment includes an evaluation of the introduced protein as well as the crop containing the protein with the goal of demonstrating the GE crop is "as-safe-as" non-GE crops in the food supply. One of the evaluations for GE crops is to assess the expressed protein for allergenic potential. Currently, no single factor is recognized as a predictor for protein allergenicity. Therefore, a weight-of-the-evidence approach, which accounts for a variety of factors and approaches for an overall assessment of allergenic potential, is conducted. This assessment includes an evaluation of the history of exposure and safety of the gene(s) source; protein structure (e.g. amino acid sequence identity to human allergens); stability of the protein to pepsin digestion in vitro; heat stability of the protein; glycosylation status; and when appropriate, specific IgE binding studies with sera from relevant clinically allergic subjects. Since GE crops were first commercialized over 20 years ago, there is no proof that the introduced novel protein(s) in any commercialized GE food crop has caused food allergy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1547-691X
1547-6901
1547-6901
DOI:10.1080/1547691X.2018.1533904