Three-dimensional volumetric quantification of fat loss following cryolipolysis

Background and Objectives Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive and well‐tolerated treatment for reduction of localized subcutaneous fat. Although several studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this procedure, volumetric fat reduction from this treatment has not been quantified. This prospective st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 75 - 80
Main Authors Garibyan, Lilit, Sipprell III, William H., Jalian, H. Ray, Sakamoto, Fernanda H., Avram, Mathew, Anderson, R. Rox
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0196-8092
1096-9101
1096-9101
DOI10.1002/lsm.22207

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive and well‐tolerated treatment for reduction of localized subcutaneous fat. Although several studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of this procedure, volumetric fat reduction from this treatment has not been quantified. This prospective study investigated the change in volume of fat after cryolipolysis treatment using three‐dimensional (3D) photography. Materials and Methods A prospective study of subjects treated with cryolipolysis on the flank (love handle) was performed at Massachusetts General Hospital. Volume measurements were performed with a Canfield Scientific Vectra three‐dimensional camera and software to evaluate the amount of post procedure volume change. Clinical outcomes were assessed with caliper measurements, subject surveys, and blinded physician assessment of photographs. Results Eleven subjects were enrolled in this study. Each subject underwent a single cycle of cryolipolysis to one flank. The untreated flank served as an internal control. The follow‐up time after treatment was 2 months. The mean amount of calculated absolute fat volume loss using 3D photography from baseline to 2 months follow‐up visit was 56.2 ± 25.6 from the treatment site and 16.6 ± 17.6 cc from the control (P < 0.0001). A mean absolute difference of 39.6 cc between the treated and untreated sides was calculated at 2 months post‐treatment. Comparison of caliper measurements from baseline to 2 months post‐treatment demonstrated significant reduction of the treated flank from 45.6 ± 5.8 mm at baseline to 38.6 ± 4.6 mm at 2 months post‐treatment (P < 0.001). The untreated flank did not show significant reduction with caliper measurements demonstrating 45.3 ± 5.0 mm at baseline and 44.6 ± 5.1 mm at 2 months post‐treatment (P = 0.360). No unexpected side effects or adverse events were reported. Post‐treatment satisfaction surveys demonstrated 82% of subjects were satisfied with the results. Conclusions Cryolipolysis is a safe, well‐tolerated, and effective noninvasive fat removal methodology that on average leads to 39.6 cc of fat loss of the treated flank at 2 months after a single treatment cycle. Lasers Surg. Med. 46:75–80, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:LSM22207
istex:55BE0809BC9BC2D931ECB403C45AC4BFD5988401
ark:/67375/WNG-4TS9X9HW-P
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.22207