Bone Regeneration Capability of 3D Printed Ceramic Scaffolds

• Published in: International journal of molecular sciences Vol. 21; no. 14; p. 4837
• Main Authors: Kim, Ju-Won, Yang, Byoung-Eun, Hong, Seok-Jin, Choi, Hyo-Geun, Byeon, Sun-Ju, Lim, Ho-Kyung, Chung, Sung-Min, Lee, Jong-Ho, Byun, Soo-Hwan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 08.07.2020; MDPI
• Subjects: 3-D printers; Animals; Bone Regeneration - physiology; Bone Substitutes - pharmacology; Bones; Calcium phosphates; Calcium Phosphates - pharmacology; Cell culture; Ceramics - pharmacology; Composite materials; Cytotoxicity; Defects; Dogs; Durapatite - pharmacology; Intubation; Male; Mandible - drug effects; Polymers; Pore size; Porosity; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Skin & tissue grafts; Studies; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry; United States > US; customizable; hydroxyapatite; digital light processing; tricalcium phosphate; 3D printing
• ISSN: 1422-0067; 1661-6596; 1422-0067
• DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144837

In this study, we evaluated the bone regenerative capability of a customizable hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffold using a digital light processing (DLP)-type 3D printing system. Twelve healthy adult male beagle dogs were the study subjects. A total of 48 defects were created, with two defects on each side of the mandible in all the dogs. The defect sites in the negative control group (sixteen defects) were left untreated (the NS group), whereas those in the positive control group (sixteen defects) were filled with a particle-type substitute (the PS group). The defect sites in the experimental groups (sixteen defects) were filled with a 3D printed substitute (the 3DS group). Six dogs each were exterminated after healing periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Radiological and histomorphometrical evaluations were then performed. None of the groups showed any specific problems. In radiological evaluation, there was a significant difference in the amount of new bone formation after 4 weeks (p < 0.05) between the PS and 3DS groups. For both of the evaluations, the difference in the total amount of bone after 8 weeks was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in new bone between the PS and 3DS groups in both evaluations after 8 weeks (p > 0.05). The proposed HA/TCP scaffold without polymers, obtained using the DLP-type 3D printing system, can be applied for bone regeneration. The 3D printing of a HA/TCP scaffold without polymers can be used for fabricating customized bone grafting substitutes.