Efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment in HIV/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients receiving abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus either lamivudine or emtricitabine as nucleoside analogue backbone

Objectives To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenof...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of antimicrobial chemotherapy Vol. 62; no. 6; pp. 1365 - 1373
Main Authors Mira, José A., López-Cortés, Luis F., Barreiro, Pablo, Tural, Cristina, Torres-Tortosa, Manuel, de los Santos Gil, Ignacio, Martín-Rico, Patricia, Ríos-Villegas, María J., Hernández-Burruezo, José Juan, Merino, Dolores, López-Ruz, Miguel Ángel, Rivero, Antonio, Muñoz, Leopoldo, González-Serrano, Mercedes, Collado, Antonio, Macías, Juan, Viciana, Pompeyo, Soriano, Vincent, Pineda, Juan A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.12.2008
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
HIV
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0305-7453
1460-2091
1460-2091
DOI10.1093/jac/dkn420

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine. Methods A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared. Results In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05–6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving ≥13.2 mg/kg/day. Conclusions HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.
Bibliography:Grupo HEPAVIR de la Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas (SAEI)
istex:8EAC27F22EE503CCE999C2FFC8547258B14DD686
ark:/67375/HXZ-DZN8TQWD-S
ArticleID:dkn420
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkn420