Outlier detection in high-density surface electromyographic signals

Recently developed techniques allow the analysis of surface EMG in multiple locations over the skin surface (high-density surface electromyography, HDsEMG). The detected signal includes information from a greater proportion of the muscle of interest than conventional clinical EMG. However, recording...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedical & biological engineering & computing Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 79 - 89
Main Authors Marateb, Hamid R., Rojas-Martínez, Monica, Mansourian, Marjan, Merletti, Roberto, Mañanas Villanueva, Miguel A.
Format Journal Article Publication
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.01.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0140-0118
1741-0444
1741-0444
DOI10.1007/s11517-011-0790-7

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recently developed techniques allow the analysis of surface EMG in multiple locations over the skin surface (high-density surface electromyography, HDsEMG). The detected signal includes information from a greater proportion of the muscle of interest than conventional clinical EMG. However, recording with many electrodes simultaneously often implies bad-contacts, which introduce large power-line interference in the corresponding channels, and short-circuits that cause near-zero single differential signals when using gel. Such signals are called ‘outliers’ in data mining. In this work, outlier detection (focusing on bad contacts) is discussed for monopolar HDsEMG signals and a new method is proposed to identify ‘bad’ channels. The overall performance of this method was tested using the agreement rate against three experts’ opinions. Three other outlier detection methods were used for comparison. The training and test sets for such methods were selected from HDsEMG signals recorded in Triceps and Biceps Brachii in the upper arm and Brachioradialis, Anconeus, and Pronator Teres in the forearm. The sensitivity and specificity of this algorithm were, respectively, 96.9 ± 6.2 and 96.4 ± 2.5 in percent in the test set (signals registered with twenty 2D electrode arrays corresponding to a total of 2322 channels), showing that this method is promising.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0140-0118
1741-0444
1741-0444
DOI:10.1007/s11517-011-0790-7