Metabolic syndrome prevalence and impact on outcomes in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

Patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) are at heightened risk for components of metabolic syndrome (MetS), yet the prevalence and impact of MetS in the cGVHD patient population remain unknown. Adult patients ( n  = 229) with cGVHD enrolled in the cross-sectional NIH cGVHD Natural Hi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) Vol. 58; no. 12; pp. 1377 - 1383
Main Authors Zhao, Aaron T., Pirsl, Filip, Steinberg, Seth M., Holtzman, Noa G., Schulz, Eduard, Mina, Alain, Mays, Jacqueline W., Cowen, Edward W., Comis, Leora E., Joe, Galen O., Yanovski, Jack A., Pavletic, Steven Z.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.12.2023
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0268-3369
1476-5365
1476-5365
DOI10.1038/s41409-023-02097-y

Cover

More Information
Summary:Patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) are at heightened risk for components of metabolic syndrome (MetS), yet the prevalence and impact of MetS in the cGVHD patient population remain unknown. Adult patients ( n  = 229) with cGVHD enrolled in the cross-sectional NIH cGVHD Natural History Study (NCT00092235) were evaluated for MetS at enrollment and for variables associated with MetS. A majority (54.1%, 124/229) of the cohort met the diagnostic criteria for MetS. Patients with higher body mass index and lower performance status scores were more likely to have MetS ( P  < 0.0001; P  = 0.026; respectively). Higher circulating erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and creatinine concentrations, along with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, were associated with MetS ( P  < 0.001; P  < 0.004; P  = 0.02; P  = 0.002; respectively). Patients with MetS compared to patients without MetS had no statistical differences in survival or NRM (5-year OS: 64% [95% CI: 54.8–71.8%] vs. 75.1% [95% CI: 65.6–82.3%]; respectively; overall P  = 0.20; 5-year NRM: 21.7% [95% CI: 13.6–30.9%] vs. 10.1% [95% CI: 4.4–18.7%]; respectively; overall P  = 0.12). Additionally, there was no difference in cGVHD severity between the two groups. Given the high prevalence of MetS in this cohort, clinicians should screen for its presence before it develops into comorbidities that complicate the course of cGVHD treatment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ATZ: conceptualization, investigation, writing; FP: conceptualization, data curation and methodology; SMS: statistical analysis; NGH: conceptualization; ED: conceptualization; AM: conceptualization; SZP: conceptualization, investigation, supervision; all authors: review, editing.
Contributions
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/s41409-023-02097-y