Evaluation of T2W FLAIR MR image quality using artificial intelligence image reconstruction techniques in the pediatric brain

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) reconstruction techniques have the potential to improve image quality and decrease imaging time. However, these techniques must be assessed for safe and effective use in clinical practice. Objective To assess image quality and diagnostic confidence of AI recon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric radiology Vol. 54; no. 8; pp. 1337 - 1343
Main Authors Nagaraj, Usha D., Dillman, Jonathan R., Tkach, Jean A., Greer, Joshua S., Leach, James L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.07.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1432-1998
0301-0449
1432-1998
DOI10.1007/s00247-024-05968-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Artificial intelligence (AI) reconstruction techniques have the potential to improve image quality and decrease imaging time. However, these techniques must be assessed for safe and effective use in clinical practice. Objective To assess image quality and diagnostic confidence of AI reconstruction in the pediatric brain on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging. Materials and methods This prospective, institutional review board (IRB)-approved study enrolled 50 pediatric patients (median age=12 years, Q1=10 years, Q3=14 years) undergoing clinical brain MRI. T2-weighted (T2W) FLAIR images were reconstructed by both standard clinical and AI reconstruction algorithms (strong denoising). Images were independently rated by two neuroradiologists on a dedicated research picture archiving and communication system (PACS) to indicate whether AI increased, decreased, or had no effect on image quality compared to standard reconstruction. Quantitative analysis of signal intensities was also performed to calculate apparent signal to noise (aSNR) and apparent contrast to noise (aCNR) ratios. Results AI reconstruction was better than standard in 99% (reader 1, 49/50; reader 2, 50/50) for overall image quality, 99% (reader 1, 49/50; reader 2, 50/50) for subjective SNR, and 98% (reader 1, 49/50; reader 2, 49/50) for diagnostic preference. Quantitative analysis revealed significantly higher gray matter aSNR (30.6±6.5), white matter aSNR (21.4±5.6), and gray-white matter aCNR (7.1±1.6) in AI-reconstructed images compared to standard reconstruction (18±2.7, 14.2±2.8, 4.4±0.8, p <0.001) respectively. Conclusion We conclude that AI reconstruction improved T2W FLAIR image quality in most patients when compared with standard reconstruction in pediatric patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1432-1998
0301-0449
1432-1998
DOI:10.1007/s00247-024-05968-8