Machine Learning Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Based on Electrocardiographic Features
Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is recognized as playing a major role in the pathophysiology of heart failure; however, clinical tools for identifying diastolic dysfunction before echocardiography remain imprecise. This study sought to develop machine-learning models that quantitatively...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 76; no. 8; pp. 930 - 941 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
25.08.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0735-1097 1558-3597 1558-3597 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.061 |
Cover
Summary: | Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is recognized as playing a major role in the pathophysiology of heart failure; however, clinical tools for identifying diastolic dysfunction before echocardiography remain imprecise.
This study sought to develop machine-learning models that quantitatively estimate myocardial relaxation using clinical and electrocardiography (ECG) variables as a first step in the detection of LV diastolic dysfunction.
A multicenter prospective study was conducted at 4 institutions in North America enrolling a total of 1,202 subjects. Patients from 3 institutions (n = 814) formed an internal cohort and were randomly divided into training and internal test sets (80:20). Machine-learning models were developed using signal-processed ECG, traditional ECG, and clinical features and were tested using the test set. Data from the fourth institution was reserved as an external test set (n = 388) to evaluate the model generalizability.
Despite diversity in subjects, the machine-learning model predicted the quantitative values of the LV relaxation velocities (e’) measured by echocardiography in both internal and external test sets (mean absolute error: 1.46 and 1.93 cm/s; adjusted R2 = 0.57 and 0.46, respectively). Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) revealed that the estimated eʹ discriminated the guideline-recommended thresholds for abnormal myocardial relaxation and diastolic and systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction) the internal (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.83, 0.76, and 0.75) and external test sets (0.84, 0.80, and 0.81), respectively. Moreover, the estimated eʹ allowed prediction of LV diastolic dysfunction based on multiple age- and sex-adjusted reference limits (AUC: 0.88 and 0.94 in the internal and external sets, respectively).
A quantitative prediction of myocardial relaxation can be performed using easily obtained clinical and ECG features. This cost-effective strategy may be a valuable first clinical step for assessing the presence of LV dysfunction and may potentially aid in the early diagnosis and management of heart failure patients.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0735-1097 1558-3597 1558-3597 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.061 |