Feasibility and Initial Outcomes of Telesurgery in Urology: a Systematic Review of the Literature

• Published in: International Brazilian Journal of Urology Vol. 51; no. 3
• Main Authors: Ferreira, Sávio Valadares, Sugai, Murilo Henrique, Nascimento, Guilherme Corrêa do, Souza Netto, Antonino Caetano de, Cabrini, Gustavo Colombo, Rodrigues, Fernando Martins, D’Avila, Cleverson Luiz Rocha, Souza, Geovanne Furtado, Zerati, Ricardo Vieira, Zerati Filho, Miguel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 01.05.2025
• Subjects: Feasibility Studies; Humans; Operative Time; Review; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Robotics; Systematic Review [Publication Type]; Telemedicine; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods; Urology; Systematic Review [Publication Type]; Robotics; Urology
• ISSN: 1677-5538; 1677-6119
• DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0494

ABSTRACT Introduction: Telesurgery allows the procedures to be carried out over long distances, however due to lack of data, its feasibility has not been consolidated yet. Since it is a promising modality, it is important to illustrate the current scenario on this subject. Objective: To review the literature aiming at the surgical success rate as a primary objective, and secondly, the most important patient outcomes and the network system. Materials and Methods: In June 2024, we followed PRISMA guidelines to research trials on urological robotic surgery in humans. We used as exclusion criteria: editorials, specialist's opinions, tele-mentoring, tele-training, small procedures, non-remote surgeries, absence of interest outcomes, telesurgeries in non-humans or in cadaver. Results: Five hundred and ninety eight studies were identified with peer review and a third reviewer for divergencies, both directed by previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting 6 studies after the exclusions. We found 54 patients who underwent urological telesurgeries; all of them were accomplished with no complications or need for conversion to open surgery. Almost all the procedures were carried out in China (98.14%) and the most used robotic model was MicroHand S (83.33%). Nephrectomy was the procedure of choice (57%). Mean surgical time was 66.2 (IQR) 56.6 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding time was 68.6 ± 76.7 milliliters. Hospital stay was 5.5 (IQR) 5 days. The distance between main surgeon and the patient was between 2,581.5 (IQR) 2,871 kilometers. 5G network was used the most (98.14%). The total network latency time was 176 (IQR) 10.9 milliseconds. Conclusion: Despite its limitations, there was evidence demonstrating that robotic surgery in the genitourinary system is safe and feasible, however it is a subject that must be well discussed, and further studies must be carried out.