Real-World Effectiveness of Dupilumab for Patients with Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Study

Treatment with dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that blocks both the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of severe asthma (SA) with type 2 inflammation. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy of this biologic for the tre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of asthma and allergy Vol. 15; pp. 395 - 405
Main Authors Numata, Takanori, Araya, Jun, Miyagawa, Hanae, Okuda, Keitaro, Takekoshi, Daisuke, Hashimoto, Mitsuo, Minagawa, Shunsuke, Ishikawa, Takeo, Hara, Hiromichi, Kuwano, Kazuyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 30.04.2022
Dove
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1178-6965
1178-6965
DOI10.2147/JAA.S357548

Cover

More Information
Summary:Treatment with dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α monoclonal antibody that blocks both the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of severe asthma (SA) with type 2 inflammation. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy of this biologic for the treatment of SA in a real-world setting. From April 2019 to December 2021, 26 Japanese patients with SA received dupilumab at Jikei University Hospital. We retrospectively evaluated the number of moderate-to-severe exacerbations, pulmonary function, maintenance dose of corticosteroids, biomarkers, and adverse events. During a mean follow-up period of 12.6 months, 10 patients received dupilumab as the first biologic, and 16 switched to dupilumab from other biologics. Dupilumab treatment significantly reduced the number of annual exacerbations from 3.4 ± 4.1 to 1.6 ± 2.7 (/person-year, p < 0.01) at the last follow-up regardless of previous biologic use. The Asthma Control Test score significantly improved in all patients by six months after administration but tended to worsen by 24 months in patients with previous biologic use. On the other hand, blood eosinophil counts (BECs) transiently increased and peaked three to six months after administration. The peak timing can be affected by previous biologic use. Adverse events included wheezing immediately after injection, hypereosinophilia, mild conjunctivitis, and relapse of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia in the patient switched from benralizumab. Dupilumab treatment was useful for patients with SA in a real-world setting. However, the BEC should be monitored carefully, especially in patients who previously received anti-IL-5/IL-5 receptor antibody.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1178-6965
1178-6965
DOI:10.2147/JAA.S357548