The Effect of Standardized Hospitalist Information Cards on the Patient Experience: a Quasi-Experimental Prospective Cohort Study

• Published in: Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM Vol. 37; no. 15; pp. 3931 - 3936
• Main Authors: Abid, Muhammad Hasan, Lucier, David J., Hidrue, Michael K., Geisler, Benjamin P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.11.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Cards; Cohort analysis; Cohort Studies; Communication; Female; Females; Hospitalists; Humans; Internal Medicine; Male; Males; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Research; Patients; Physician patient relationships; Physician-Patient Relations; Prospective Studies; Quasi-experimental methods; Regression models; Statistical analysis; patient satisfaction [MeSH]; physician-patient relations [MeSH]; communication [MeSH]; patient-centered care [MeSH]; patient-reported outcome measures [MeSH]; patient experience
• ISSN: 0884-8734; 1525-1497; 1525-1497
• DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07674-3

Background Communication with clinicians is an important component of a hospitalized patient’s experience. Objective To test the impact of standardized hospitalist information cards on the patient experience. Design Quasi-experimental study in a U.S. tertiary-care center. Participants All-comer medicine inpatients. Interventions Standardized hospitalist information cards containing name and information on a hospitalist’s role and availability vs. usual care. Main Measures Patients’ rating of the overall communication as excellent (“top-box” score); qualitative feedback summarized via inductive coding. Key Results Five hundred sixty-six surveys from 418 patients were collected for analysis. In a multivariate regression model, standardized hospitalist information cards significantly improved the odds of a “top-box” score on overall communication (odds ratio: 2.32; 95% confidence intervals: 1.07–5.06). Other statistically significant covariates were patient age (0.98, 0.97–0.99), hospitalist role (physician vs. advanced practice provider, 0.56; 0.38–0.81), and hospitalist-patient gender combination (female-female vs. male-male, 2.14; 1.35–3.40). Eighty-seven percent of patients found the standardized hospitalist information cards useful, the perceived most useful information being how to contact the hospitalist and knowing their schedule. Conclusions Hospitalized patients’ experience of their communication with hospitalists may be improved by using standardized hospitalist information cards. Younger patients cared for by a team with an advanced practice provider, as well as female patients paired with female providers, were more likely to be satisfied with the overall communication. Assessing the impact of information cards should be studied in other settings to confirm generalizability.