Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil

Clostridioides ( Clostridium ) difficile is responsible for most cases of nosocomial diarrhea and, despite the high prevalence of the disease worldwide, the best laboratory diagnostic approach to diagnose C. difficile infection (CDI) is a subject of ongoing debate. Although the use of multiple tests...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrazilian journal of microbiology Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 1139 - 1143
Main Authors Ramos, Carolina Pantuzza, Lopes, Emily Oliveira, Diniz, Amanda Nádia, Lobato, Francisco Carlos Faria, Vilela, Eduardo Garcia, Silva, Rodrigo Otávio Silveira
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.09.2020
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1517-8382
1678-4405
1678-4405
DOI10.1007/s42770-020-00288-z

Cover

More Information
Summary:Clostridioides ( Clostridium ) difficile is responsible for most cases of nosocomial diarrhea and, despite the high prevalence of the disease worldwide, the best laboratory diagnostic approach to diagnose C. difficile infection (CDI) is a subject of ongoing debate. Although the use of multiple tests is recommended, the cost of these algorithms commonly exceeds the affordability in some countries. Thus, to improve CDI diagnosis in a university hospital in Brazil, this study analyzed two immunochromatographic tests and one enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) to evaluate the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile . Stool samples of 89 adult patients presenting nosocomial diarrhea during hospitalization were included. The toxigenic culture was used as the reference method. GDH detection by both commercial tests showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92.1%). On the other hand, toxin-based methods showed a sensitivity between 19.2 and 57.7%. In conclusion, the results suggest that rapid tests for GDH detection are not only suitable for CDI diagnosis as screening tests but also as a single method.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Responsible Editor: Roxane Piazza.
ISSN:1517-8382
1678-4405
1678-4405
DOI:10.1007/s42770-020-00288-z