Field Distribution of Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation in Realistic Human Head Model
Objective The objective of this work was to characterize the magnetic field (B‐field) that arises in a human brain model from the application of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS). Materials and Methods The spatial distribution of the B‐field magnitude and gradient of a cylindrica...
Saved in:
Published in | Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 340 - 347 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Limited
01.06.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1094-7159 1525-1403 1525-1403 |
DOI | 10.1111/ner.12699 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective
The objective of this work was to characterize the magnetic field (B‐field) that arises in a human brain model from the application of transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS).
Materials and Methods
The spatial distribution of the B‐field magnitude and gradient of a cylindrical, 5.08 cm × 2.54 cm NdFeB magnet were simulated in air and in a human head model using the finite element method and calibrated with measurements in air. The B‐field was simulated for magnet placements over prefrontal, motor, sensory, and visual cortex targets. The impact of magnetic susceptibility of head tissues on the B‐field was quantified.
Results
Peak B‐field magnitude and gradient respectively ranged from 179–245 mT and from 13.3–19.0 T/m across the cortical targets. B‐field magnitude, focality, and gradient decreased with magnet–cortex distance. The variation in B‐field strength and gradient across the anatomical targets largely arose from the magnet–cortex distance. Head magnetic susceptibilities had negligible impact on the B‐field characteristics. The half‐maximum focality of the tSMS B‐field ranged from 7–12 cm3.
Significance
This is the first presentation and characterization of the three‐dimensional (3D) spatial distribution of the B‐field generated in a human brain model by tSMS. These data can provide quantitative dosing guidance for tSMS applications across various cortical targets and subjects. The finding that the B‐field gradient is high near the magnet edges should be considered in studies where neural tissue is placed close to the magnet. The observation that susceptibility has negligible effects confirms assumptions in the literature. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to Conflict of Interest http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-301854.html Source(s) of financial support: This work was supported in part by a Research Incubator Award from Duke Institute for Brain Sciences. J. J. Tharayil and J. M. Bernabei declare no relevant disclosures. S. M. Goetz is inventor on patents and patent applications on conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation with pulsed fields (TMS), and has received royalties through his current and previous employers as well as patent application support and research funding from Magstim. Unrelated to brain stimulation, he is also employed part‐time by Porsche AG, Stuttgart, Germany. A. V. Peterchev is inventor on patents and patent applications and has received research and travel support as well as patent royalties from Rogue Research, research and travel support, consulting fees, as well as equipment loan from Tal Medical, patent application support and hardware donations from Magstim, as well as equipment loans from MagVenture, all related to technology for conventional TMS with pulsed fields. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1094-7159 1525-1403 1525-1403 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ner.12699 |