Effectiveness of Capsule Endoscopy Compared with Other Diagnostic Modalities in Patients with Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

As a result of the rapid development of medical diagnostic tools, physicians require concrete evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of the tools. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and additional diagnostic benefits of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut and liver Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 62 - 72
Main Authors Choi, Miyoung, Lim, Sungwon, Choi, Myung-Gyu, Shim, Ki-Nam, Lee, Seon Heui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 01.01.2017
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1976-2283
2005-1212
2005-1212
DOI10.5009/gnl16015

Cover

More Information
Summary:As a result of the rapid development of medical diagnostic tools, physicians require concrete evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of the tools. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and additional diagnostic benefits of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). We performed a systematic search of databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, as well as eight domestic databases. Two reviewers independently screened all references. Diagnostic data from the studies were collected, and a meta-analysis was performed. Twenty-four studies were included. In cases of suspected CD, CE demonstrated a superior diagnostic yield compared with small bowel follow-through (SBFT) and enteroclysis (EC); however, there was no difference compared with computed tomography enterography or magnetic resonance enterography. In cases with established CD, CE demonstrated a higher diagnostic yield only compared with EC. In the detection of terminal ileum lesions, CE exhibited a significantly increased detection rate compared with ileoscopy. The findings of our meta-analysis indicate that CE is superior to SBFT and EC in the evaluation of suspected CD cases. CE is also a more effective diagnostic modality in patients with established CD compared with EC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
G704-SER000001589.2017.11.1.024
ISSN:1976-2283
2005-1212
2005-1212
DOI:10.5009/gnl16015