Sequencing bilateral robot-assisted arm therapy and constraint-induced therapy improves reach to press and trunk kinematics in patients with stroke

• Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 31
• Main Authors: Hsieh, Yu-wei, Liing, Rong-jiuan, Lin, Keh-chung, Wu, Ching-yi, Liou, Tsan-hon, Lin, Jui-chi, Hung, Jen-wen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 22.03.2016
• Subjects: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Biomedicine; Combined Modality Therapy - methods; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Movement; Neurology; Neurosciences; Rehabilitation Medicine; Robotics - methods; Stroke Rehabilitation; Treatment Outcome; Robotic rehabilitation; Stroke; Sequential combination therapy; Upper extremity; Constraint-induced
• ISSN: 1743-0003; 1743-0003
• DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0138-5

Background The combination of robot-assisted therapy (RT) and a modified form of constraint-induced therapy (mCIT) shows promise for improving motor function of patients with stroke. However, whether the changes of motor control strategies are concomitant with the improvements in motor function after combination of RT and mCIT (RT + mCIT) is unclear. This study investigated the effects of the sequential combination of RT + mCIT compared with RT alone on the strategies of motor control measured by kinematic analysis and on motor function and daily performance measured by clinical scales. Methods The study enrolled 34 patients with chronic stroke. The data were derived from part of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Participants in the RT + mCIT and RT groups received 20 therapy sessions (90 to 105 min/day, 5 days for 4 weeks). Patients in the RT + mCIT group received 10 RT sessions for first 2 weeks and 10 mCIT sessions for the next 2 weeks. The Bi-Manu-Track was used in RT sessions to provide bilateral practice of wrist and forearm movements. The primary outcome was kinematic variables in a task of reaching to press a desk bell. Secondary outcomes included scores on the Wolf Motor Function Test, Functional Independence Measure, and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living. All outcome measures were administered before and after intervention. Results RT + mCIT and RT demonstrated different benefits on motor control strategies. RT + mCIT uniquely improved motor control strategies by reducing shoulder abduction, increasing elbow extension, and decreasing trunk compensatory movement during the reaching task. Motor function and quality of the affected limb was improved, and patients achieved greater independence in instrumental activities of daily living. Force generation at movement initiation was improved in the patients who received RT. Conclusion A combination of RT and mCIT could be an effective approach to improve stroke rehabilitation outcomes, achieving better motor control strategies, motor function, and functional independence of instrumental activities of daily living. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01727648