Reduction of pesticide application via real-time precision spraying

Farmers focus on reducing the cost of production and aim to increase profit. The objective of this study was to quantify the reduction of pesticides applied to soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merrill) and maize ( Zea mays L.) crops in several stages of the production cycle using a site-specific spraying...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 5638 - 12
Main Authors Zanin, Alex Rogers Aguiar, Neves, Danilo Carvalho, Teodoro, Larissa Pereira Ribeiro, da Silva Júnior, Carlos Antonio, da Silva, Simone Pereira, Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo, Baio, Fábio Henrique Rojo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 04.04.2022
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI10.1038/s41598-022-09607-w

Cover

More Information
Summary:Farmers focus on reducing the cost of production and aim to increase profit. The objective of this study was to quantify the reduction of pesticides applied to soybean ( Glycine max (L.) Merrill) and maize ( Zea mays L.) crops in several stages of the production cycle using a site-specific spraying application based on real-time sensors in the Brazilian Cerrado region. The sprayers were equipped with a precision spraying control system based on a real-time sensor. The spraying operations were performed not only for herbicide, but also for fungicide and insecticides applications. The maps recorded the percentage of the spray boom when the application was turned on (on/off spray system) with nozzle-to-nozzle control. The precision spraying system based on real-time sensors reduced the volume of pesticides (including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides) applied to soybean and maize crops. There was a more significant reduction in the volume of pesticides applied post-emergence of the crops in the initial stages of soybean and maize when the crops had less leaf area or less foliage coverage between the rows. The cost reduction achieved using this technology was 2.3 times lower than the cost associated with pesticide application over the entire area using a conventional sprayer. Under the experimental conditions, there were no differences in the average crop yield, compared to the historical productivity of soybean and maize crops by applying this technology because the recommended doses were not affected and the site of application was limited to points where the presence of plants was present was detected.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09607-w