Virtual reality check: a comparison of virtual reality, screen-based, and real world settings as research methods for HRI

To reduce costs and effort, experiments in human-robot interaction can be carried out in Virtual Reality (VR) or in screen-based (SB) formats. However, it is not well examined whether robots are perceived and experienced in the same way in VR and SB as they are in the physical world. This study addr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in robotics and AI Vol. 10; p. 1156715
Main Authors Plomin, Jana, Schweidler, Paul, Oehme, Astrid
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 27.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2296-9144
2296-9144
DOI10.3389/frobt.2023.1156715

Cover

More Information
Summary:To reduce costs and effort, experiments in human-robot interaction can be carried out in Virtual Reality (VR) or in screen-based (SB) formats. However, it is not well examined whether robots are perceived and experienced in the same way in VR and SB as they are in the physical world. This study addresses this topic in a between-subjects experiment, measuring trust and engagement of an interaction with a mobile service robot in a museum scenario. Measures were made in three different settings, either the real world, in VR or in a game-like SB and then compared with an ANOVA. The results indicate, that neither trust nor engagement differ dependent on the experimental setting. The results imply that both VR and SB are eligible ways to explore the interaction with a mobile service robot, if some peculiarities of each medium are taken into account.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Muneeb Imtiaz Ahmad, Swansea University, United Kingdom
Sven Wachsmuth, Bielefeld University, Germany
Edited by: Lucio Soibelman, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
ISSN:2296-9144
2296-9144
DOI:10.3389/frobt.2023.1156715