Mix and Match: An Investigation into Whether Episodic Future Thinking Cues Need to Match Discounting Delays in Order to Be Effective

• Published in: Behavioral sciences Vol. 9; no. 1; p. 1
• Main Authors: O’Donnell, Sara, Hollis-Hansen, Kelseanna, Epstein, Leonard H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 21.12.2018; MDPI
• Subjects: Bias; Decision making; delay discounting; Drug use; episodic future thinking; Intervention; Investigations; Marijuana; Memory; temporal; United States > US; delay discounting; temporal; episodic future thinking
• ISSN: 2076-328X; 2076-328X
• DOI: 10.3390/bs9010001

Episodic future thinking (EFT), or prospectively imagining yourself in the future, has been developed into an intervention tool to reduce delay discounting (DD), or the preference for smaller immediate over larger future rewards, and to make healthier choices that promote long-term health rather than short-term enjoyment. Most EFT interventions use EFT cues whose future events match the time delays of the DD task, which may limit the utility of EFT. The current study (N = 160, Mage = 35.25, 47.5% female) used a 2 × 2 factorial design with type of episodic thinking (matched, unmatched) and temporal perspective (EFT, episodic recent thinking (ERT)) as between-subject factors to investigate whether there were differences in DD for groups that had EFT cues matched to the time delays of the DD task in comparison to cues with unmatched temporal delays. The results showed EFT reduced DD compared to ERT controls, and no differences emerged between matched and unmatched EFT groups. Our findings suggest that either the process of generating EFT cues or the use of any positive and vivid future event, regardless of whether it is matched to the DD task, can reduce DD.