Fast chromatographic method for the determination of dyes in beverages by using high performance liquid chromatography—Diode array detection data and second order algorithms
A fast chromatographic methodology is presented for the analysis of three synthetic dyes in non-alcoholic beverages: amaranth (E123), sunset yellow FCF (E110) and tartrazine (E102). Seven soft drinks (purchased from a local supermarket) were homogenized, filtered and injected into the chromatographi...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Journal of Chromatography A Vol. 1216; no. 42; pp. 7063 - 7070 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Amsterdam
          Elsevier B.V
    
        16.10.2009
     Elsevier  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0021-9673 1873-3778 1873-3778  | 
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.077 | 
Cover
| Summary: | A fast chromatographic methodology is presented for the analysis of three synthetic dyes in non-alcoholic beverages: amaranth (E123), sunset yellow FCF (E110) and tartrazine (E102). Seven soft drinks (purchased from a local supermarket) were homogenized, filtered and injected into the chromatographic system. Second order data were obtained by a rapid LC separation and DAD detection. A comparative study of the performance of two second order algorithms (MCR-ALS and U-PLS/RBL) applied to model the data, is presented. Interestingly, the data present time shift between different chromatograms and cannot be conveniently corrected to determine the above-mentioned dyes in beverage samples. This fact originates the lack of trilinearity that cannot be conveniently pre-processed and can hardly be modelled by using U-PLS/RBL algorithm. On the contrary, MCR-ALS has shown to be an excellent tool for modelling this kind of data allowing to reach acceptable figures of merit. Recovery values ranged between 97% and 105% when analyzing artificial and real samples were indicative of the good performance of the method. In contrast with the complete separation, which consumes 10
mL of methanol and 3
mL of 0.08
mol
L
−1 ammonium acetate, the proposed fast chromatography method requires only 0.46
mL of methanol and 1.54
mL of 0.08
mol
L
−1 ammonium acetate. Consequently, analysis time could be reduced up to 14.2% of the necessary time to perform the complete separation allowing saving both solvents and time, which are related to a reduction of both the costs per analysis and environmental impact. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23  | 
| ISSN: | 0021-9673 1873-3778 1873-3778  | 
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.077 |