Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and frequentist approaches for longitudinal modeling: application to Alzheimer’s disease

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 14448 - 10
• Main Authors: Pérez-Millan, Agnès, Contador, José, Tudela, Raúl, Niñerola-Baizán, Aida, Setoain, Xavier, Lladó, Albert, Sánchez-Valle, Raquel, Sala-Llonch, Roser
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 24.08.2022; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 639/705; 692/308; 692/617; Alzheimer's disease; Bayesian analysis; Cognitive ability; Data reduction; Hippocampus; Humanities and Social Sciences; multidisciplinary; Neurodegenerative diseases; Neuroimaging; Science; Science (multidisciplinary)
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18129-4

Linear mixed effects (LME) modelling under both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks can be used to study longitudinal trajectories. We studied the performance of both frameworks on different dataset configurations using hippocampal volumes from longitudinal MRI data across groups—healthy controls (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, including subjects that converted from MCI to AD. We started from a big database of 1250 subjects from the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI), and we created different reduced datasets simulating real-life situations using a random-removal permutation-based approach. The number of subjects needed to differentiate groups and to detect conversion to AD was 147 and 115 respectively. The Bayesian approach allowed estimating the LME model even with very sparse databases, with high number of missing points, which was not possible with the frequentist approach. Our results indicate that the frequentist approach is computationally simpler, but it fails in modelling data with high number of missing values.