Comparison of Techniques of Vascular Control in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: The Leicester Experience

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of three different methods to secure the renal vessels during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Vessel lengths and intraoperative vascular complications were compared in a prospective series of 106 LDNs in which the vessels had b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransplantation proceedings Vol. 38; no. 10; pp. 3406 - 3408
Main Authors Kaushik, M., Bagul, A., Yates, P.J., Elwell, R., Nicholson, M.L.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2006
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.142

Cover

More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of three different methods to secure the renal vessels during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Vessel lengths and intraoperative vascular complications were compared in a prospective series of 106 LDNs in which the vessels had been secured using a stapling device, metal clips, or polymer clips. One hundred six patients underwent LDN (right = 25, left = 81). Renal vein lengths were not significantly different after stapling or using polymer clips (36 ± 10 vs 37 ± 9 mm; P = .463). Renal arterial length was shorter after stapling (30 ± 7 mm) compared with both endoclips (34 ± 10 mm; P = .030) and polymer clips (34 ± 8 mm; P = .030). There was one major arterial bleed in the endoclip group, one episode of stapler malfunction, but no adverse events with polymer clips. Polymer clips are safe and yield greater vessel lengths during LDN.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.142