The proton sponge hypothesis: Fable or fact?

In non-viral gene therapy, cationic polymers and lipids are frequently used to encapsulate macromolecular therapeutics into nanoparticles. During their journey to deliver the cargo to the intended intracellular target, many biological barriers need to be overcome. One of the major bottlenecks for ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics Vol. 129; pp. 184 - 190
Main Authors Vermeulen, Lotte M.P., De Smedt, Stefaan C., Remaut, Katrien, Braeckmans, Kevin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.08.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0939-6411
1873-3441
1873-3441
DOI10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.034

Cover

More Information
Summary:In non-viral gene therapy, cationic polymers and lipids are frequently used to encapsulate macromolecular therapeutics into nanoparticles. During their journey to deliver the cargo to the intended intracellular target, many biological barriers need to be overcome. One of the major bottlenecks for efficient transfection is the endosomal barrier since nanoparticles often remain entrapped inside endosomes and are trafficked towards the lysosomes where the cargo is degraded. For cationic polymers, the proton sponge hypothesis was introduced in the late ‘90s as a way to explain their endosomal escape properties. However, to date, no consensus has been reached in the scientific community about the validity of this hypothesis due to many contradictory reports. Here we review the sometimes conflicting reports that have been published on the proton sponge hypothesis. We also discuss membrane destabilization and polymer swelling as additional factors that might influence endosomal escape of polyplexes. Based on the key publications on this subject, we aim to launch a consensus on the role of the proton sponge hypothesis in endosomal escape.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0939-6411
1873-3441
1873-3441
DOI:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.034