Evaluating CAM treatment at the end of life: A review of clinical trials for massage and meditation

There is a pressing need for improved end-of-life care. Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may improve the quality of care but few controlled trials have evaluated CAM at the end of life. To determine the strength of evidence for the benefits of touch and mind-body therapies in seri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComplementary therapies in medicine Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 100 - 112
Main Authors Lafferty, William E., Downey, Lois, McCarty, Rachelle L., Standish, Leanna J., Patrick, Donald L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2006
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0965-2299
1873-6963
DOI10.1016/j.ctim.2006.01.009

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is a pressing need for improved end-of-life care. Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) may improve the quality of care but few controlled trials have evaluated CAM at the end of life. To determine the strength of evidence for the benefits of touch and mind-body therapies in seriously ill patients. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of massage and mind-body therapies. A PubMed search of English language articles was used to identify the relevant studies. Of 27 clinical trials testing massage or mind-body interventions, 26 showed significant improvements in symptoms such as anxiety, emotional distress, comfort, nausea and pain. However, results were often inconsistent across studies and there were variations in methodology, so it was difficult to judge the clinical significance of the results. Use of CAM at the end of life is warranted on a case-by-case basis. Limitations in study design and sample size of the trials analyzed mean that routine use of CAM cannot be supported. There are several challenges to be addressed in future research into the use of CAM in end-of-life patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0965-2299
1873-6963
DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2006.01.009