Late Frontal Negativity Discriminates Outcomes and Intentions in Trust-Repayment Behavior
Altruism (a costly action that benefits others) and reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an individual’s behavior...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 532295 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Switzerland
          Frontiers Media S.A
    
        25.11.2020
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1664-1078 1664-1078  | 
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295 | 
Cover
| Summary: | Altruism (a costly action that benefits others) and reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an individual’s behavior and neurophysiological activity under outcome- versus intention-based interactions has not been compared directly using different endowments in the same subject and during the same session. Here, we used a mixed version of the Dictator and the Investment games, together with electroencephalography, to uncover a subject’s behavior and brain activity when challenged with endowments of different sizes in contexts that call for an altruistic (outcome-based) versus a reciprocal (intention-based) response. We found that subjects displayed positive or negative reciprocity (reciprocal responses greater or smaller than that for altruism, respectively) depending on the amount of trust they received. Furthermore, a subject’s late frontal negativity differed between conditions, predicting responses to trust in intentions-based trials. Finally, brain regions related with mentalizing and cognitive control were the cortical sources of this activity. Thus, our work disentangles the behavioral components present in the repayment of trust, and sheds light on the neural activity underlying the integration of outcomes and perceived intentions in human economic interactions. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology Reviewed by: Giorgia Ponsi, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Valerio Capraro, Middlesex University, United Kingdom Edited by: Ron Sun, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, United States  | 
| ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078  | 
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295 |