Late Frontal Negativity Discriminates Outcomes and Intentions in Trust-Repayment Behavior

Altruism (a costly action that benefits others) and reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an individual’s behavior...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 532295
Main Authors Aspé-Sánchez, Mauricio, Mengotti, Paola, Rumiati, Raffaella, Rodríguez-Sickert, Carlos, Ewer, John, Billeke, Pablo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 25.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295

Cover

More Information
Summary:Altruism (a costly action that benefits others) and reciprocity (the repayment of acts in kind) differ in that the former expresses preferences about the outcome of a social interaction, whereas the latter requires, in addition, ascribing intentions to others. Interestingly, an individual’s behavior and neurophysiological activity under outcome- versus intention-based interactions has not been compared directly using different endowments in the same subject and during the same session. Here, we used a mixed version of the Dictator and the Investment games, together with electroencephalography, to uncover a subject’s behavior and brain activity when challenged with endowments of different sizes in contexts that call for an altruistic (outcome-based) versus a reciprocal (intention-based) response. We found that subjects displayed positive or negative reciprocity (reciprocal responses greater or smaller than that for altruism, respectively) depending on the amount of trust they received. Furthermore, a subject’s late frontal negativity differed between conditions, predicting responses to trust in intentions-based trials. Finally, brain regions related with mentalizing and cognitive control were the cortical sources of this activity. Thus, our work disentangles the behavioral components present in the repayment of trust, and sheds light on the neural activity underlying the integration of outcomes and perceived intentions in human economic interactions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Giorgia Ponsi, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy; Valerio Capraro, Middlesex University, United Kingdom
Edited by: Ron Sun, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, United States
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.532295