Diagnostic and prognostic value of preoperative combined GFAP, IGFBP‐2, and YKL‐40 plasma levels in patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND Circulating proteins released by tumor cells have recently been investigated as potential single surrogate biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The aim of the current hypothesis‐generating study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of preoperative insulin‐like growt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 120; no. 24; pp. 3972 - 3980
Main Authors Gállego Pérez‐Larraya, Jaime, Paris, Sophie, Idbaih, Ahmed, Dehais, Caroline, Laigle‐Donadey, Florence, Navarro, Soledad, Capelle, Laurent, Mokhtari, Karima, Marie, Yannick, Sanson, Marc, Hoang‐Xuan, Khê, Delattre, Jean‐Yves, Mallet, Alain
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell 15.12.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI10.1002/cncr.28949

Cover

More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Circulating proteins released by tumor cells have recently been investigated as potential single surrogate biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The aim of the current hypothesis‐generating study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of preoperative insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 2 (IGFBP‐2), chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (YKL‐40), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) plasma levels in patients with GBM, both as single markers and as a combined profile. METHODS Plasma samples from 111 patients with GBM and a subset of 40 patients with nonglial brain tumors were obtained preoperatively. Plasma from 99 healthy controls was also analyzed. IGFBP‐2, YKL‐40, and GFAP levels were determined using enzyme‐linked immunoadsorbent assay tests. Their association with histological and radiological variables was assessed. RESULTS Circulating levels of all 3 proteins were found to be significantly higher in patients with GBM compared with healthy controls (P < .01). Only YKL‐40 and GFAP were found to demonstrate significant differences between patients with GBM and nonglial brain tumors (P = .04). GFAP was undetectable (<0.02 ng/mL) in all patients without GBM. A receiver operating characteristic analysis accounting for a 2‐step diagnostic procedure including the 3 biomarkers afforded an area under the curve of 0.77 for differentiating patients with GBM from those with nonglial brain tumors. There was a significant correlation between tumor volume and plasma IGFBP‐2 level (Spearman Rho correlation coefficient, 0.22; P = .025) and GFAP (Spearman Rho correlation coefficient, 0.36; P < .001) among patients with GBM. Preoperative plasma IGFBP‐2 levels were found to be independently associated with worse overall survival among patients with GBM (hazard ratio, 1.3; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS A combined profile of preoperative IGFBP‐2, GFAP, and YKL‐40 plasma levels could serve as an additional diagnostic tool for patients with inoperable brain lesions suggestive of GBM. In addition, IGFBP‐2 levels appear to constitute an independent prognostic factor in patients with GBM. Cancer 2014;120:3972–3980. © 2014 American Cancer Society. A combined profile of preoperative insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 2 (IGFBP‐2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (YKL‐40) plasma levels could serve as a potential diagnostic tool for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). IGFBP‐2 levels appear to constitute an independent prognostic factor in patients with GBM.
Bibliography:Presented in part at the LXIV Annual Meeting of the Spanish Society of Neurology; November 20‐24, 2012; Barcelona, Spain.
We thank Professor P. Cornu, Dr. C. Houillier, Dr. D. Psimaras, and Dr. S. Taillibert for their clinical assistance.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.28949