Low-Abundance Drug-Resistant Viral Variants in Chronically HIV-Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment–Naive Patients Significantly Impact Treatment Outcomes

BackgroundMinor (i.e., <20% prevalence) drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants may go undetected, yet be clinically important ObjectivesTo compare the prevalence of drug-resistant variants detected with standard and ultra-deep sequencing (detection down to 1% prevalence) and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 199; no. 5; pp. 693 - 701
Main Authors Simen, Birgitte B., Simons, Jan Fredrik, Hullsiek, Katherine Huppler, Novak, Richard M., MacArthur, Rodger D., Baxter, John D., Huang, Chunli, Lubeski, Christine, Turenchalk, Gregory S., Braverman, Michael S., Desany, Brian, Rothberg, Jonathan M., Egholm, Michael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford The University of Chicago Press 01.03.2009
University of Chicago Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI10.1086/596736

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundMinor (i.e., <20% prevalence) drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants may go undetected, yet be clinically important ObjectivesTo compare the prevalence of drug-resistant variants detected with standard and ultra-deep sequencing (detection down to 1% prevalence) and to determine the impact of minor resistant variants on virologic failure (VF) MethodsThe Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies (FIRST) Study (N = 1397) compared 3 initial antiretroviral therapy (ART) strategies. A random subset (n = 491) had baseline testing for drug-resistance mutations performed by use of standard sequencing methods. Ultra-deep sequencing was performed on samples that had sufficient viral content (N = 264). Proportional hazards models were used to compare rates of VF for those who did and did not have mutations identified ResultsMutations were detected by standard and ultra-deep sequencing (in 14% and 28% of participants, respectively; P<.001). Among individuals who initiated treatment with an ART regimen that combined nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (hereafter, “NNRTI strategy”), all individuals who had an NNRTI-resistance mutation identified by ultra-deep sequencing experienced VF. When these individuals were compared with individuals who initiated treatment with the NNRTI strategy but who had no NNRTI-resistance mutations, the risk of VF was higher for those who had an NNRTI-resistance mutation detected by both methods (hazard ratio [HR], 12.40 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.41–45.10]) and those who had mutation(s) detected only with ultra-deep sequencing (HR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.17–5.36]) ConclusionsUltra-deep sequencing identified a significantly larger proportion of HIV-infected, treatment-naive persons as harboring drug-resistant viral variants. Among participants who initiated treatment with the NNRTI strategy, the risk of VF was significantly greater for participants who had low- and high-prevalence NNRTI-resistant variants
Bibliography:Reprints or correspondence: Michael J Kozal, MD, Yale University School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 323, New Haven, CT 06510 (michael.kozal@yale.edu); or Michael Egholm, PhD, 454 Life Sciences, a Roche Company, 20 Commercial Street, Branford, CT 06405 (michael.egholm@roche.com)
ark:/67375/HXZ-NL33NB35-S
istex:30ED83A84C84CA2F15DF9E536675E542218DE970
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/596736