Prediction of Fatness by Standing 8‐Electrode Bioimpedance: A Multiethnic Adolescent Population

The objective of this study was to validate an 8‐electrode bioimpedance analysis (BIA8) device (BC‐418; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan) for use in populations of European, Maori, Pacific Island, and Asian adolescents. Healthy adolescents (215 M, 216 F; 129 Pacific Island, 120 Asian, 91 Maori, and 91 European;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inObesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 183 - 189
Main Authors Sluyter, John D., Schaaf, David, Scragg, Robert K.R., Plank, Lindsay D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1930-7381
1930-739X
1930-739X
DOI10.1038/oby.2009.166

Cover

More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to validate an 8‐electrode bioimpedance analysis (BIA8) device (BC‐418; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan) for use in populations of European, Maori, Pacific Island, and Asian adolescents. Healthy adolescents (215 M, 216 F; 129 Pacific Island, 120 Asian, 91 Maori, and 91 European; age range 12–19 years) were recruited by purposive sampling of high schools in Auckland, New Zealand. Weight, height, sitting height, leg length, waist circumference, and whole‐body impedance were measured. Fat mass (FM) and fat‐free mass (FFM) derived from the BIA8 manufacturer's equations were compared with measurements by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA‐measured FFM was used as the reference to develop prediction equations based on impedance. A double cross‐validation technique was applied. BIA8 underestimated FM by 2.06 kg (P < 0.0001) and percent body fat (%BF) by 2.84% (P < 0.0001), on average. However, BIA8 tended to overestimate FM and %BF in lean and underestimate FM and %BF in fat individuals. Sex‐specific equations developed showed acceptable accuracy on cross‐validation. In the total sample, the best prediction equations were, for boys: FFM (kg) = 0.607 height (cm)2/impedance (Ω) + 1.542 age (y) + 0.220 height (cm) + 0.096 weight (kg) + 1.836 ethnicity (0 = European or Asian, 1 = Maori or Pacific) − 47.547, R2 = 0.93, standard error of estimate (SEE) = 3.09 kg; and, for girls: FFM (kg) = 0.531 height (cm)2/impedance (Ω) + 0.182 height (cm) + 0.096 weight (kg) + 1.562 ethnicity (0 = non‐Pacific, 1 = Pacific) − 15.782, R2 = 0.91, SEE = 2.19 kg. In conclusion, equations for fatness estimation using BIA8 developed for our sample perform better than reliance on the manufacturer's estimates. The relationship between BIA and body composition in adolescents is ethnicity dependent.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1930-7381
1930-739X
1930-739X
DOI:10.1038/oby.2009.166