Acronyms and Opportunities for Improving Deep Nets
Recently, several studies have reported promising results with BERT-like methods on acronym tasks. In this study, we find an older rule-based program, Ab3P, not only performs better, but error analysis suggests why. There is a well-known spelling convention in acronyms where each letter in the short...
Saved in:
Published in | Frontiers in artificial intelligence Vol. 4; p. 732381 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
13.12.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2624-8212 2624-8212 |
DOI | 10.3389/frai.2021.732381 |
Cover
Summary: | Recently, several studies have reported promising results with BERT-like methods on acronym tasks. In this study, we find an older rule-based program, Ab3P, not only performs better, but error analysis suggests why. There is a well-known spelling convention in acronyms where each letter in the short form (SF) refers to “salient” letters in the long form (LF). The error analysis uses decision trees and logistic regression to show that there is an opportunity for many pre-trained models (BERT, T5, BioBert, BART, ERNIE) to take advantage of this spelling convention. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by: Robert Krovetz, Lexical Research, United States Michael Flor, Educational Testing Service, United States Reviewed by: Luis Espinosa-Anke, Cardiff University, United Kingdom This article was submitted to Language and Computation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence |
ISSN: | 2624-8212 2624-8212 |
DOI: | 10.3389/frai.2021.732381 |