Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in early breast cancer patients and aprepitant efficacy as salvage therapy. Results from the Spanish Breast Cancer Group/2009-02 study
Docetaxel–cyclophosphamide (TC) has become a common regimen in moderate-high-risk early breast cancer (EBC), but the incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with this regimen is not well established. This trial investigates the effect of guideline-consistent prophylaxis on CINV...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 58; pp. 122 - 129 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Elsevier Ltd
01.05.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0959-8049 1879-0852 1879-0852 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.015 |
Cover
Summary: | Docetaxel–cyclophosphamide (TC) has become a common regimen in moderate-high-risk early breast cancer (EBC), but the incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with this regimen is not well established. This trial investigates the effect of guideline-consistent prophylaxis on CINV related to TC regimen and explores the efficacy of aprepitant among resistant patients.
This prospective multicentre study enrolled 212 chemotherapy-naïve EBC patients receiving T-75 mg/m2 and C-600 mg/m2. Antiemetic therapy on the first cycle consisted of dexamethasone for 3 d plus 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists on day 1, according to Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines. The primary end-point was complete response (CR) (no emesis and no need of rescue treatment within the initial 120 h). Patients failing CR on cycle 1 entered in a single-arm study exploring the efficacy of aprepitant on the second cycle. Patients' diaries and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) questionnaires were collected in cycles 1 and 2.
Among the 185 evaluable patients on cycle 1, 161 (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.2–91.8) achieved a CR. Twenty-three patients received aprepitant on cycle 2, and 12 reached a CR (52.2%, 95% CI: 31.8–72.6). The absence of CR had a very substantial impact on quality of life on cycles 1 (FLIE before and after: 23.8–38.1, p = 0.0124) and 2 (18.3–42.9, p = 0.0059).
Guideline-consistent antiemetic prophylaxis for the TC regimen is associated with a low incidence of CINV. Aprepitant is effective as secondary prevention of CINV and should be considered as rescue therapy in patients treated with moderate emetogenic chemotherapy.
•Proper use of standard antiemetic therapy for docetaxel–cyclophosphamide provides a high chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control rate.•Aprepitant as secondary prophylaxis induced a high CINV control rate.•The absence of good CINV control rate negatively impacts quality of life. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0959-8049 1879-0852 1879-0852 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.015 |