An interference account of the missing-VP effect
Sentences with doubly center-embedded relative clauses in which a verb phrase (VP) is missing are sometimes perceived as grammatical, thus giving rise to an illusion of grammaticality. In this paper, we provide a new account of why missing-VP sentences, which are both complex and ungrammatical, lead...
Saved in:
| Published in | Frontiers in psychology Vol. 6; p. 766 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Switzerland
Frontiers Media S.A
16.06.2015
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00766 |
Cover
| Summary: | Sentences with doubly center-embedded relative clauses in which a verb phrase (VP) is missing are sometimes perceived as grammatical, thus giving rise to an illusion of grammaticality. In this paper, we provide a new account of why missing-VP sentences, which are both complex and ungrammatical, lead to an illusion of grammaticality, the so-called missing-VP effect. We propose that the missing-VP effect in particular, and processing difficulties with multiply center-embedded clauses more generally, are best understood as resulting from interference during cue-based retrieval. When processing a sentence with double center-embedding, a retrieval error due to interference can cause the verb of an embedded clause to be erroneously attached into a higher clause. This can lead to an illusion of grammaticality in the case of missing-VP sentences and to processing complexity in the case of complete sentences with double center-embedding. Evidence for an interference account of the missing-VP effect comes from experiments that have investigated the missing-VP effect in German using a speeded grammaticality judgments procedure. We review this evidence and then present two new experiments that show that the missing-VP effect can be found in German also with less restricting procedures. One experiment was a questionnaire study which required grammaticality judgments from participants without imposing any time constraints. The second experiment used a self-paced reading procedure and did not require any judgments. Both experiments confirm the prior findings of missing-VP effects in German and also show that the missing-VP effect is subject to a primacy effect as known from the memory literature. Based on this evidence, we argue that an account of missing-VP effects in terms of interference during cue-based retrieval is superior to accounts in terms of limited memory resources or in terms of experience with embedded structures. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Clinton L. Johns, Haskins Laboratories, USA; Manuel Gimenes, University of Poitiers, France Edited by: Matthew Wagers, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology |
| ISSN: | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
| DOI: | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00766 |