A Greek Multicentre Study Assessing the Outcome of Late Rupture After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. A multi-institutional Greek study of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 756 - 764
Main Authors Moulakakis, Konstantinos G., Lazaris, Andreas M., Georgiadis, George S., Kakkos, Stavros, Papavasileiou, Vasileios G., Antonopoulos, Constantine N., Papapetrou, Anastasios, Katsikas, Vasilios, Klonaris, Chris, Geroulakos, George, Tasopoulou, Kalliopi-Maria, Triantafyllou, Nikolaos, Papadoulas, Spyros I., Tsimpoukis, Andreas L., Stagkoglou, Christos, Seretis, Konstantinos, Papas, Theophanis T., Tsiantoula, Paraskevi, Kakisis, John D., Sfyroeras, George, Maltezos, Chrysostomos, Kopadis, George, Chatzigakis, Petros K., Katsargyris, Athanasios, Hasemaki, Natasha, Bountouris, Ioannis, Theocharopoulos, Georgios
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier B.V 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1078-5884
1532-2165
1532-2165
DOI10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.12.025

Cover

More Information
Summary:Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. A multi-institutional Greek study of late ruptures after EVAR between 2008 – 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were intra-operative and in hospital death. A total of 70 patients presented with late rupture after EVAR (proportion of ruptured EVARs among all EVARs, 0.6%; 69 males; mean age 77.2 ± 6.7 years). The mean time interval between EVAR and late rupture was 72.3 months (range 6 – 180 months). In all cases the cause of rupture was the presence of an endoleak (type I, 73%) with sac enlargement. Moreover, 34% of subjects with rupture after EVAR had been lost to follow up and 32% underwent a secondary intervention. Additionally, 57 patients (81%) were treated by conversion to open surgical repair (COSR) and the remainder by endovascular correction of endoleak (ECE). Eleven intra-operative deaths (16%) were recorded. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 41% (23% ECE vs. 46% COSR; p = .21). Of the patients who presented as initially haemodynamically stable, 23% died during hospitalisation, while the respective mortality rate for patients who presented as unstable was 78% (odds ratio [OR] 11.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 – 39.1; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that severity of haemodynamic shock was the most significant risk factor for intra-operative (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.58 – 32.40; p = .010) and in hospital death (OR 9.53, 95% CI 2.79 – 32.58; p < .001). These data underline the devastating prognosis of late rupture after EVAR. Haemodynamic status at presentation was an important predictive factor for death both in the ECE and COSR groups. Rigorous follow up and prompt evaluation of an unstable patient in case of rupture after EVAR is recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.12.025