A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT OF MAGNETIC RECONNECTION: OUTFLOWS, HEATING, AND WAVES IN CHROMOSPHERIC JETS

Hinode observations have revealed intermittent recurrent plasma ejections/jets in the chromosphere. These are interpreted as a result of non-perfectly anti-parallel magnetic reconnection, i.e., component reconnection, between a twisted magnetic flux tube and the pre-existing coronal/chromospheric ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Astrophysical journal Vol. 756; no. 2; pp. 152 - 11
Main Authors Nishizuka, N., Hayashi, Y., Tanabe, H., Kuwahata, A., Kaminou, Y., Ono, Y., Inomoto, M., Shimizu, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bristol IOP 10.09.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/152

Cover

More Information
Summary:Hinode observations have revealed intermittent recurrent plasma ejections/jets in the chromosphere. These are interpreted as a result of non-perfectly anti-parallel magnetic reconnection, i.e., component reconnection, between a twisted magnetic flux tube and the pre-existing coronal/chromospheric magnetic field, though the fundamental physics of component reconnection is not revealed. In this paper, we experimentally reproduced the magnetic configuration and investigated the dynamics of plasma ejections, heating, and wave generation triggered by component reconnection in the chromosphere. We set plasma parameters as in the chromosphere (density 10 super(14) cm super(-3), temperature 5-10 eV, i.e., (5-10) x 10 super(4) K, and reconnection magnetic field 200 G) using argon plasma. Our experiment shows bi-directional outflows with the speed of 5 km s super(-1) at maximum, ion heating in the downstream area over 30 eV, and magnetic fluctuations mainly at 5-10 mu s period. We succeeded in qualitatively reproducing chromospheric jets, but quantitatively, we still have some differences between observations and experiments such as in jet velocity, total energy, and wave frequency. Some of them can be explained by the scale gap between solar and laboratory plasma, while the others are probably due to the difference in microscopy and macroscopy, collisionality, and the degree of ionization, which have not been achieved in our experiment.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/152