Macroprolactin does not contribute to elevated levels of prolactin in patients on renal replacement therapy

Summary Objective  Three molecular forms of PRL with molecular weights of 23, 50–60 and > 100 kDa have been defined. The high‐molecular‐weight forms are called macroprolactin. Different immunoassays produce varyingly elevated results with macroprolactin‐containing sera. The kidneys are reported t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical endocrinology (Oxford) Vol. 63; no. 5; pp. 520 - 524
Main Authors Yavuz, Dilek, Topçu, Güler, Özener, Çetin, Akalın, Sema, Sirikçi, Önder
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.11.2005
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0300-0664
1365-2265
DOI10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02375.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Objective  Three molecular forms of PRL with molecular weights of 23, 50–60 and > 100 kDa have been defined. The high‐molecular‐weight forms are called macroprolactin. Different immunoassays produce varyingly elevated results with macroprolactin‐containing sera. The kidneys are reported to clear 25% of PRL from the circulation. Hyperprolactinaemia is seen in 20–75% of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). PRL clearance rate has been reported to be reduced in CRF and the resulting hyperprolactinaemia is due to reduced renal function. Patients  To determine the contribution of macroprolactinaemia to elevated PRL levels in CRF, 91 patients receiving haemodialysis (HD), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and renal transplantation (RT) therapies and 72 control subjects were included in the study. Measurements  Serum PRL levels were measured by a sandwich immunoassay with electrochemical detection. Following polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, recovery ratios were calculated and samples with a recovery of < 50% were identified as having macroprolactin isoforms. Results  The serum and supernatant PRL levels of CRF patients were significantly higher than those of the control group (P < 0·001). The serum PRL levels of HD and CAPD patients were significantly higher than those of the RT patients (P < 0·001). The serum PRL levels of the RT patients and the control group did not differ significantly (P > 0·05). A moderate correlation was found between PRL and creatinine levels (r = 0·609, P < 0·001). Conclusions  The hyperprolactinaemia seen in renal replacement therapy is not associated with the presence of macroprolactin isoforms but with the decline in renal function.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-KRH3K4G5-W
ArticleID:CEN2375
istex:9C83FE7BBF75B965E07EF557B29D7CFB8330F262
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-0664
1365-2265
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02375.x