The anchoring effect in business intelligence supported decision-making
This article reports on a study that is part of a larger project on how Business intelligence (BI) can effectively support a range of decisions made by different decision-makers through the lens of behavioural economics. This study examines one cognitive bias, the anchoring effect. A laboratory expe...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of decision systems Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 67 - 81 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Taylor & Francis
03.04.2019
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1246-0125 2116-7052 |
DOI | 10.1080/12460125.2019.1620573 |
Cover
Summary: | This article reports on a study that is part of a larger project on how Business intelligence (BI) can effectively support a range of decisions made by different decision-makers through the lens of behavioural economics. This study examines one cognitive bias, the anchoring effect. A laboratory experiment was conducted where participants used a BI system to make a forecast. Two anchors with the same value were presented; a spurious anchor and a plausible anchor. We were interested if the use of a BI system would mitigate the negative consequences of the anchoring effect. Our results show BI system use mitigates the effect of a spurious anchor, but not a plausible anchor. That is, despite the significant expenditure on BI, decision-makers can still be subject to major biases and make less rational decisions. This study indicates that cognitive bias is an important topic for BI supported decision makingresearch and practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1246-0125 2116-7052 |
DOI: | 10.1080/12460125.2019.1620573 |