How to Develop, Validate, and Compare Clinical Prediction Models Involving Radiological Parameters: Study Design and Statistical Methods
Clinical prediction models are developed to calculate estimates of the probability of the presence/occurrence or future course of a particular prognostic or diagnostic outcome from multiple clinical or non-clinical parameters. Radiologic imaging techniques are being developed for accurate detection...
Saved in:
Published in | Korean journal of radiology Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 339 - 350 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Society of Radiology
01.05.2016
대한영상의학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1229-6929 2005-8330 |
DOI | 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.339 |
Cover
Summary: | Clinical prediction models are developed to calculate estimates of the probability of the presence/occurrence or future course of a particular prognostic or diagnostic outcome from multiple clinical or non-clinical parameters. Radiologic imaging techniques are being developed for accurate detection and early diagnosis of disease, which will eventually affect patient outcomes. Hence, results obtained by radiological means, especially diagnostic imaging, are frequently incorporated into a clinical prediction model as important predictive parameters, and the performance of the prediction model may improve in both diagnostic and prognostic settings. This article explains in a conceptual manner the overall process of developing and validating a clinical prediction model involving radiological parameters in relation to the study design and statistical methods. Collection of a raw dataset; selection of an appropriate statistical model; predictor selection; evaluation of model performance using a calibration plot, Hosmer-Lemeshow test and c-index; internal and external validation; comparison of different models using c-index, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement; and a method to create an easy-to-use prediction score system will be addressed. This article may serve as a practical methodological reference for clinical researchers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 G704-001113.2016.17.3.006 |
ISSN: | 1229-6929 2005-8330 |
DOI: | 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.339 |