Efficacy and safety of dutasteride in Japanese men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objectives:  To assess the efficacy and safety of dutasteride in Japanese men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods:  This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. A total of 378 subjects with clinical BPH having an International Prostate Symptom Score (IP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of urology Vol. 16; no. 9; pp. 745 - 750
Main Authors Tsukamoto, Taiji, Endo, Yukihiro, Narita, Michiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.09.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0919-8172
1442-2042
1442-2042
DOI10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02357.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives:  To assess the efficacy and safety of dutasteride in Japanese men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods:  This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group study. A total of 378 subjects with clinical BPH having an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8 points or greater, a prostate volume of 30 mL or greater, and a maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) of 15 mL/s or less were randomized to receive placebo or dutasteride once daily for 52 weeks. Subjects were stratified according to tamsulosin use at baseline. The numbers of subjects with and without tamsulosin use were 242 and 136, respectively. IPSS, Qmax, prostate volume and drug safety were evaluated. Results:  Continued improvement in IPSS was noted in the dutasteride group, and dutasteride significantly decreased IPSS compared with placebo. At week 52, dutasteride significantly improved Qmax and prostate volume compared with placebo. Drug‐related sexual function events in the dutasteride group were infrequent and generally were not treatment limiting. Conclusions:  Dutasteride improves urinary symptoms and flow rate and reduces prostate volume. In Japanese men with BPH, it is effective and generally well tolerated during the one‐year treatment period.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-VG493N05-C
ArticleID:IJU2357
istex:FAF52DFDFF50AC7E3FF419C3C7A2F971676C574D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0919-8172
1442-2042
1442-2042
DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02357.x