Treating eating disorders over the internet: A systematic review and future research directions

Objective To review the literature regarding internet‐based treatment of eating disorders (ED). Method Relevant studies were identified by searching electronic databases (including Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science). Eligible studies evaluated an internet‐based treatment for ED, or an ED...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe International journal of eating disorders Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 539 - 552
Main Authors Aardoom, Jiska J., Dingemans, Alexandra E., Spinhoven, Philip, Van Furth, Eric F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0276-3478
1098-108X
1098-108X
DOI10.1002/eat.22135

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective To review the literature regarding internet‐based treatment of eating disorders (ED). Method Relevant studies were identified by searching electronic databases (including Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science). Eligible studies evaluated an internet‐based treatment for ED, or an ED treatment that included at least one internet‐based component. Results Twenty‐one studies were included. Methodological quality varied. Internet‐based treatments were superior to waiting lists in reducing ED psychopathology, frequency of binge eating and purging, and in improving (ED‐related) quality of life. Internet‐based treatment was more effective for individuals with less comorbid psychopathology, binge eating as opposed to restrictive problems, and individuals with binge eating disorder as opposed to bulimia nervosa. Higher levels of compliance were related to more improvements in ED symptoms. Study dropout ranged from 5.3 to 76.8%. Inclusion of face‐to‐face assessments and therapist support seemed to enhance study compliance. Overall, the internet can be considered an acceptable vehicle for delivering ED treatment. Discussion Future research should determine the utility of internet‐based treatment by comparing them to face‐to‐face treatment. Research should furthermore focus on unraveling predictors and mediators of treatment outcome, compliance, and dropout, respectively. Studies with good methodological quality are needed with reports according to CONSORT guidelines. © 2013 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (Int J Eat Disord 2013; 46:539–552)
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-W46LHJ1Z-9
ArticleID:EAT22135
istex:CC9C73119C8C87BB6E43B468543274CF370985F7
Supported by ProYouth, an European initiative for the promotion of mental health and the prevention of eating disorders in young people, and is co‐financed by the European Commission's Executive Agency for Health and Consumers in the Health Programme (Contract No: 20101209).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0276-3478
1098-108X
1098-108X
DOI:10.1002/eat.22135