The natural language explanation algorithms for the lung cancer computer-aided diagnosis system

•Two algorithms of the lung cancer CADx system explanation is proposed.•The explanation is implemented via natural language.•A low-dimensional feature representation of CT lung nodule images is considered to simplify classification and explanation.•An efficient explanation method is based on using a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArtificial intelligence in medicine Vol. 108; p. 101952
Main Authors Meldo, Anna, Utkin, Lev, Kovalev, Maxim, Kasimov, Ernest
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.08.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0933-3657
1873-2860
1873-2860
DOI10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101952

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Two algorithms of the lung cancer CADx system explanation is proposed.•The explanation is implemented via natural language.•A low-dimensional feature representation of CT lung nodule images is considered to simplify classification and explanation.•An efficient explanation method is based on using a set of simple classifiers which provide short phrases as classes. Two algorithms for explaining decisions of a lung cancer computer-aided diagnosis system are proposed. Their main peculiarity is that they produce explanations of diseases in the form of special sentences via natural language. The algorithms consist of two parts. The first part is a standard local post-hoc explanation model, for example, the well-known LIME, which is used for selecting important features from a special feature representation of the segmented lung suspicious objects. This part is identical for both algorithms. The second part is a model which aims to connect selected important features and to transform them to explanation sentences in natural language. This part is implemented differently for both algorithms. The training phase of the first algorithm uses a special vocabulary of simple phrases which produce sentences and their embeddings. The second algorithm significantly simplifies some parts of the first algorithm and reduces the explanation problem to a set of simple classifiers. The basic idea behind the improvement is to represent every simple phrase from vocabulary as a class of the “sparse” histograms. An implementation of the second algorithm is shown in detail.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0933-3657
1873-2860
1873-2860
DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101952