Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3

A panel of members of the 2009 International Myeloma Workshop developed guidelines for standard investigative workup of patients with suspected multiple myeloma. Both serum and urine should be assessed for monoclonal protein. Measurement of monoclonal protein both by densitometer tracing and/by neph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBlood Vol. 117; no. 18; pp. 4701 - 4705
Main Authors Dimopoulos, Meletios, Kyle, Robert, Fermand, Jean-Paul, Rajkumar, S. Vincent, San Miguel, Jesus, Chanan-Khan, Asher, Ludwig, Heinz, Joshua, Douglas, Mehta, Jayesh, Gertz, Morie, Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Beksaç, Meral, Anderson, Kenneth C., Moreau, Philippe, Singhal, Seema, Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Boccadoro, Mario, Kumar, Shaji, Giralt, Sergio, Munshi, Nikhil C., Jagannath, Sundar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Elsevier Inc 05.05.2011
Americain Society of Hematology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-4971
1528-0020
1528-0020
DOI10.1182/blood-2010-10-299529

Cover

More Information
Summary:A panel of members of the 2009 International Myeloma Workshop developed guidelines for standard investigative workup of patients with suspected multiple myeloma. Both serum and urine should be assessed for monoclonal protein. Measurement of monoclonal protein both by densitometer tracing and/by nephelometric quantitation is recommended, and immunofixation is required for confirmation. The serum-free light chain assay is recommended in all newly diagnosed patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. Bone marrow aspiration and/or biopsy along with demonstration of clonality of plasma cells are necessary. Serum β2-microglobulin, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase are necessary for prognostic purposes. Standard metaphase cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization for 17p, t(4;14), and t(14;16) are recommended. The skeletal survey remains the standard method for imaging screening, but magnetic resonance imaging frequently provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Most of these tests are repeated during follow-up or at relapse.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Conference-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-5
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2010-10-299529